Re: How closely do you watch message numbers?
Howard, on host 65.56.199.110
Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:00:53
Re: How closely do you watch message numbers? posted by Grishny on Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 11:18:49:
> > It seems that forum message no. 50.000 > went by completely unnoticed ... Until now. > > > > Trav"leaves it to someone else to do the > obligatory looking-back and statistics"holt. > > You think that's bad... The 60,000th forum post > not only went unnoticed, it got deleted. Who > knows what it might have been? No doubt the > whole milestone thing was overshadowed by > the RU3; I noticed that the surrounding posts > were all about the convention. > > It only took you two weeks to notice that the > 50,000th post had been overlooked. This time > it was nearly two months. I have a feeling that > the practice of observing message forum > milestone posts is quickly going the way of the > dodo now that there are three forums open > and posting is growing exponentially. > > As an aside... I'm curious. It's been just over a > year, I think, since Message Forum 2 opened. > How much longer will posting replies to old > threads on Forum 1 be allowed, I wonder?
As strange as it may seem, I don't see any message numbers anywhere on Forum 2. So I don't have any idea where we are, numerically speaking. Could it be my computer? My eyesight?
A few months ago, I was reading the posts on a scooter site and noticed that the last one was numbered 9999. So naturally, I posted number 10,000 and commented on the milestone we had reached. Nobody even commented on my comment, so I would assume that means it wasn't important to them. Maybe it's just a RinkWorks sort of thing. Howard
|